Background: Sherry Ortner’s seminal piece “Is Female to Male as Nature is to Culture?” sets the stage for a critical understanding of the division of the cultural world into gendered dichotomies—male (culture), female (nature); male (public), female (private/domestic); male (creativity), female (procreativity). A quote from Ortner’s article offers an explanation of these divisions: “woman’s body seems to doom her to mere reproduction of life; the male, in contrast, lacking natural creative functions, must (or has the opportunity to) assert his creativity externally, ‘artificially,’ through the medium of technology and symbols. In so doing, he creates relatively lasting, eternal, transcendental objects, while the woman creates only perishables—human beings” (1974:75). Though Ortner’s work is not focused on popular culture and the media, it is clear that the suggested universality of male to culture/female to nature is prominent in many of the print ads. In many of the ads women are pictured in reference to nature in such a way that they are seen as closer to nature than men.
Focus on the Ads: Can you find similar advertising images of men being connected to nature?
Image 1
Image 2
Image 3
Image 4
Image 5
Image 6
Image 7
Image 8
Image 9
Image 10
Image 11
Image 12
Image 13
Image 14
Image 15
Image 16
Image 17
Image 18
Image 19
Image 20
Image 21
Image 22
Image 23
Image 24
Image 25
Home
