<The Gender ADs Project>


Sexual Violence



<Background: John Stoltenberg (1997b) develops an important critique of male heterosexuality by focusing on the need for males to take an active role in creating non-violent relationships. He discusses the need of consent, mutuality and respect in sexual and personal relationships. He suggests that men can work to not have their sexuality manipulated by the pornography industry, drugs or alcohol and that men “start choosing now not to fixate on fucking” (1997b:227). This last quote situates the discussion of ads that emphasize sexual violence against women in the terrain of the personal. An ultimate goal of a free gender society is to alter the media landscape and eliminate such ads from it, but a more immediate goal allows men to specifically alter their psychological and physical approaches to women, or men, in heterosexual and homosexual relationships. One of the ultimate questions that must be asked when studying gender and popular imagery is that of causality—what is the impact of images on people’s lives and their relationships? Of course, it is too simplistic to assume a “Judas Priest Factor”—that exposure to a particular form of popular culture will result in a specific behavioral reaction in individuals—but there is remarkable evidence that the ads present in our society do impact our psychological understandings of gender and sexuality. As Lindsey suggests in highlighting previous research on this subject (Rudman and Verdi 1993; Lanis and Covell 1995), “males exposed to ads where females are portrayed as sex objects are more accepting of rape-supportive attitudes and predictive of subjective levels of exploitation” (1997:315). Clearly, the construction of masculinity involves a dual defamation of women as sex objects and a maintenance of male sexual superiority (cf. Hood 1995).  The Ads: Consider the disturbing S&M image in 10. This is not an image from a smut magazine, it's a mainstream fashion image! Have a look at images 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. What are the implications for a democratic society when we are telling our citizens that its alright to sexually touch and assault women (does the current Arnold Schwarzenegger controversy seem relevant here?) Images 33, 36 and 37 are very troubling: what type of society can we aspire to create when we are not valuing the right of a woman, or anyone, to SAY NO!? Then there is the issue of ad 64, which for me is one of the most disgusting images of popular culture I have seen. In some cases, advertisers use allusions to "not being able to say NO" in ads (such as in #s76 and 77). Questions: (1) Consider the following hypothetical situation: you are debating an individual who says that images such as the ones on this page should not be censored because they are representative of free speech. How do you respond? (2) Consider the following hypothetical situation: you are debating an individual who says that images such as the ones on this page are simply reflections of the fact that  sensational and shocking images sell products better than less shocking images. How do you respond? (3) How are the images of sexual violence in advertising similar to images of sexual violence in pornographic movies and magazines? How are they different? (4) Do an Internet search for Andrea Dworkin's work Pornography: Men Possessing Women. How does Dworkin's work inform the analysis of images on this page?   >


Image 1

Image 2

Image 3

Image 4

Image 5

Image 6







Image 7

Image 8

Image 9

Image 10

Image 11

Image 12







Image 13

Image 14

Image 15

Image 16

Image 17

Image 18







Image 19

Image 20

Image 21

Image 22

Image 23

Image 24







Image 25

Image 26

Image 27

Image 28

Image 29

Image 30







Image 31

Image 32

Image 33

Image 34

Image 35

Image 36







Image 37

Image 38

Image 39

Image 40

Image 41

Image 42







Image 43

Image 44

Image 45

Image 46

Image 47

Image 48

Image 49

Image 50

Image 51

Image 52

Image 53

Image 54

Image 55

Image 56

Image 57

Image 58

Image 59

Image 60

Image 61

Image 62

Image 63

Image 64

Image 65

Image 66

Image 67 Image 68 Image 69 Image 70 Image 71 Image 72
Image 73 Image 74 Image 75 Image 76 Image 77 Image 78
Image 79 Image 80 Image 81 Image 82 Image 83 Image 84
Image 85 Image 86 Image 87 Image 88 Image 89 Image 90
Image 91 Image 92 Image 93 Image 94 Image 95 Image 96
Image 97 Image 98 Image 99 Image 100 Image 101 Image 102
Image 103 Image 104 Image 105 Image 106 Image 107 Image 108
Image 109 Image 110        





<presented by Scott A. Lukas, Ph.D.>